The chamber might take votes on that query as quickly as Friday. Democrats, who’ve been pushing for witnesses like former nationwide safety adviser John Bolton, have been calling for not less than 4 Republicans to hitch with them to hit the 51-vote threshold to win the vote to permit witnesses. However what occurs if there is a tie vote, leading to a 50-50 break up amongst senators? There was simmering debate over the query, with some Democrats overtly speculating that Roberts, who’s presiding over the Senate trial, may step in to interrupt a tie. General, nevertheless, there’s a widespread expectation on Capitol Hill — on either side of the aisle — that a tie vote would fail.
“If it ends in a tie? Properly, I imply if you do not have a majority, then it fails, yeah, the movement fails,” Sen. John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota and a member of GOP management, informed CNN on Wednesday when requested concerning the vote on witnesses.
“I feel the chances are — robust chance — is he wouldn’t break a tie and I’d respect his place if he did not,” Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut stated of the chief justice.
Democratic Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania stated, “I am assuming that on one thing that elementary, he is gonna make — he’ll have the Senate make the dedication.”
Requested then if a 50-50 vote would fail, Casey responded, “That is my understanding.”
Usually, when the Senate just isn’t sitting as a courtroom of impeachment, the vp is permitted to step in and break tie votes, an influence outlined within the Structure.
The Structure additionally dictates that the chief justice should preside throughout a presidential impeachment trial, however nowhere does it say that the chief justice would have tie-breaking energy whereas serving in that function.
Some Democratic senators, nevertheless, are nonetheless hoping that Roberts may intervene within the occasion of a tie.
“There may be really precedent for that,” Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware informed CNN, when requested if there’s been dialogue amongst Democrats over whether or not the chief justice might break a tie vote on witnesses, pointing to the impeachment trial of former President Andrew Johnson.
Throughout that trial, in 1868, Chief Justice Salmon Chase broke tie votes twice, however these strikes and his political stance all through that trial stay controversial in the present day.
Requested if Democrats imagine that the chief justice might probably break tie votes once more through the present impeachment trial, Coons stated, “Sure, I imply, I do not converse for all Senate Democrats. It is one thing I feel might occur.”
In distinction, through the 1999 impeachment trial of former President Invoice Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist noticed his function as restricted, famously remarking that he “did nothing particularly, and did it very nicely.”
“There may be precedent,” Blumenthal stated, however he added, “It isn’t trendy precedent.”
Senate Democrats have argued strongly in favor of calling witnesses through the trial, saying that a honest trial calls for the flexibility to listen to from extra witnesses, corresponding to Bolton who has stated he is prepared to look if subpoenaed. Bolton, in accordance with a draft manuscript first reported by The New York Occasions earlier this week, alleges that Trump informed him over the summer time that he wished to proceed holding army assist to Ukraine till the nation helped with investigations into his potential political opponents.
Senate Republicans with just a few exceptions, nevertheless, have pushed again, arguing that calling witnesses would unnecessarily delay the trial and that the Senate just isn’t answerable for pursuing strains of inquiry that the Home of Representatives didn’t in its personal impeachment investigation.
The partisan divide has led to tense debate over whether or not extra testimony ought to be allowed and intense hypothesis over what is going to occur when the Senate votes to determine whether or not to allow calling witnesses — a vote anticipated to happen on Friday following the conclusion of Thursday’s question-and-answer session.
As for the query of whether or not the chief justice might break a tie if it have been to happen, a report from the Congressional Analysis Service put it this fashion: “The Chief Justice, when presiding over an impeachment trial, wouldn’t be anticipated to vote, even within the case of a tie. If a vote on a query ends in a tie, the query is set within the destructive.”
CNN’s Joan Biskupic and Ali Zaslav contributed to this report.